Here’s legitimate economist, Don Boudreaux, blogging at cafehayek.com… Ironically, his book Globalization inspired my finger-painting below, although Chinese tires wasn’t then his chosen topic (as it was in my scribble):

Lobbyist Scott Paul details the bounty that American tire producers now reap from the Obama administration’s tariff on Americans who buy Chinese tires (Letters, Jan. 26).  He then asserts that these gains prove the tariff’s merit.

Bull.

The argument against tariffs is not that they fail to yield benefits to protected industries; rather, it’s that these benefits come at the greater expense of the public at large.  Mr. Paul’s letter is evidence of the truth of Albert Venn Dicey’s observation that “Every man feels or thinks that protection would benefit his own business, and it is difficult to realize that what may be a benefit for any man taken alone, may be of no benefit to a body of men looked at collectively.”*

Mr. Paul’s false assumption that the gains to tire manufacturers are gains to Americans at large proves not the merit of the tire tariff but, instead, the narrowness of the tunnel vision of a rent-seeking lobbyist and of the rapacious corporations that he serves.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Professor of Economics
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA  22030

The following’s a replay from Letter to Mr. Romney

Popular Posts

One Response

01.27.12

Thanks for that lesson. I had no idea how one affected the other. Very enlightening…and depressing. I am going to have to read up on protectionism. Thanks again.

Leave Your Response

* Name, Email, Comment are Required
*

Blog Archive

show
 
close
Guess Who’s Buying Treasuries http://j.mp/lO1xGo via @AddToAny